Possible options: 1. Electric crossover compact may be on the way. 2. Pipeline for compact electric crossover seen. 3. Compact electric crossover in development. 4. Potential compact
The CEO of Ford, Jim Farley, has recently stated that the ever-evolving electric vehicle market and its declining demand have presented challenges in forecasting the profitability of future EVs. As a result, the company must develop smaller electric cars that cater to a wider customer base or risk further loss of profits.Farley expressed concerns over the unpredictability of the electric vehicle market, making it hard for the company to determine the financial success of their upcoming EV models. This has forced Ford to reevaluate their current approach and focus on engineering smaller electric cars that can attract a broader audience.If they fail to adapt to the changing trends and continue to solely rely on larger EVs, Ford’s profits will continue to dwindle. To avoid this fate, the company has recognized the need to appeal to a diverse range of customers by offering smaller electric vehicles that are more budget-friendly and practical.In conclusion, Ford’s CEO acknowledges the impact of the transforming electric vehicle market and the importance of addressing it by creating smaller, more accessible electric cars to secure profits in the future.
According to Farley’s statement at the Wolfe Research Global Auto Conference, “I’ve been in the prediction business in the EV business; it hasn’t been a great journey.” He goes on to explain that while it may feel good to make bold predictions about the future, such as saying “it’s 2027,” the reality is often far different.
Only recently, Ford made known its development of a confidential group tasked with creating an inexpensive platform to compete against both Tesla and Chinese electric vehicle brands. The foremost goal of this platform was to generate profits within the initial 12 months of being introduced. In the previous year, Ford conceded to experiencing a loss of $36,000 for each electric vehicle sold and declared its intention to decrease investments in EVs.
According to the CEO, “What the customer has now said to us is, if you have [an EV] larger than Escape, it better be really functional or a work vehicle.” However, he also stated that when considering the economics of a vehicle, such as the Escape or smaller, the results are completely different and the vehicle is highly efficient. In fact, the operating cost is significantly lower than that of a Corolla, Civic, or even a Maverick.
It is speculated that Ford’s budget-friendly electric vehicle platform will likely serve as the foundation for a compact crossover, resembling the dimensions of the Escape. Although the company currently offers an Explorer EV in Europe, it closely resembles Volkswagen’s MEB platform and is essentially a disguised version of the Volkswagen ID.4 branded as a Ford.
Ford is reportedly working on an Escape electric vehicle (EV), a move that could attract a large number of customers, provided the pricing is set correctly.
The Mustang Mach-E stands at a base cost of $42,995, which means a smaller crossover would need to be considerably more affordable to garner attention. A price point of approximately $35,000 would be highly desirable, and if Ford guarantees compliance with the tax credit incentive guidelines, it may qualify for the full $7,500 discount, ultimately lowering the overall cost even more.
It is unlikely that Ford will introduce a compact hatchback, as smaller cars have lost popularity among American buyers. However, there is potential for a medium-sized electric sedan to thrive. In the US market, Ford has ceased selling conventional sedans and reviving one on the shelves (even if it is powered by battery) could entice loyal customers to rejoin the Blue Oval brand.
Considering the overwhelming demand for crossovers, it is highly likely that Ford will soon unveil two or more compact crossovers that will sit below the Mustang Mach-E in their lineup. Additionally, there is also the possibility of a minivan option, similar to the E-Tourneo Connect model sold in Europe.
Farley emphasized the importance of addressing the issue of competing with China in a fair and ethical manner. He stated, “If you cannot compete fair and square with the Chinese around the world, then 20 to 30% of your revenue is at risk.” This highlights the significant impact that failing to compete fairly with China can have on a company’s revenue. Farley stressed the urgency of finding a solution, stating, “We have to fix this problem. We have to address this.” It is clear that Farley believes it is crucial for companies to confront this issue in order to protect their revenue and maintain a level playing field in the global market.
The chief executive officer also addressed the UAW, expressing his disappointment when the union closed down several successful plants. He further implied that the company may consider relocating production due to the higher costs imposed by the recent automotive strikes, which led to more costly UAW agreements.
In a recent report by Automotive News, the speaker expressed, “That was a moment for us. Clearly, our relationship has changed,” further stating, “Does it have a business impact? Yes.”
The decision to hire a greater number of union workers and produce higher quantities of vehicles in UAW-controlled factories within the United States sets a significant precedent for Ford’s financial success. As a result, the company must ultimately consider the most efficient location for its manufacturing operations. These sentiments have been met with strong backlash from the UAW on various social media platforms, indicating potential future conflict.
We appreciate Farley’s goal of creating more affordable vehicles, but we must approach this with caution and avoid overly optimistic expectations.