Tesla Hiding Defects in New & Old Cars: Report

Essential Elements of a Name

A scathing probe conducted by Reuters has accused Elon Musk and the engineers at his auto company of being aware of unsatisfactory components in Tesla cars for years but attributing responsibility for them to unsuspecting drivers.

The account of Shreyansh Jain purchasing a 2023 Tesla Model Y just to have its front-right suspension give way 115 miles later is one that’s captured ongoing attention. In response, Tesla has pointed the finger at Jain, alleging that damage was present prior to his purchase and that he should therefore be accountable for the costly $14,000 restoration.

Reuters examined several thousand materials concerning Tesla and unearthed substantial flaws in some recent models. These issues are worldwide, yet most surprisingly, the issues range back for seven years and across all of Tesla’s vehicle collection.

The examination also suggests that Tesla was aware of the high rate and intensity of the defective components for a prolonged time period but did not submit the data to its purchasers or overseers. In the event that this report is true, it could be destructive to the company; the repercussions might surpass even those of the two-million vehicle recall, which would appear to be insignificant in comparison.

Reuters acquired documents ranging from 2016 to 2022, comprising of repair records, engineers’ assessments regarding malfunctioning components, as well as memorandums explicitly commanding technicians to inform clients that their cars’ faulty items were not truly defective.

In the interest of balanced reporting, Reuters reached out for comment, but Tesla famously doesn’t have a media relations department. In response to the issue, Musk had a unique reply, which was a much more creative way of saying “Go play with yourself.”

It is apparent that the manner in which Elon Musk administers his company, Tesla, diverges from the customary protocol. He has instigated a system that sells directly to customers with no intermediary dealer implicated at any point of the transaction. What is more, most of the servicing centers are operated by Tesla themselves which should mean diagnosing production errors should take up significantly less time compared to what one would expect from a classic automobile maker, such as Ford.

This is what the report alleges occurred. The company documents reportedly demonstrate that engineers tracked and examined problems for a long period. However, in their formal statements to US regulators, Tesla refrained from accepting accounts of flawed components. In order to circumvent this, it is said that they simply shifted responsibility to the owners by pointing to misuse of the cars. This update came from prior service supervisors and company notes. What’s more, it states that Tesla charged customers out-of-warranty fees to retrieve parts that were allegedly known to be defective.

Regrettably, engineers persisted in desiring to reconstruct these deficient components and even discussed recovering capital from providers for doubtful parts. This altogether generates a humiliated heap of verification versus Tesla.

Hence, what element are we discussing right now? Per the report, we’re addressing insufficient suspension mechanisms like control arms and joints which compose a central component of a vehicle’s suspension arrangement. Other parts that flunked with extraordinary speed comprise half shafts, left and right drive axles, and determination racks. Each and every one of those can cause horrific crashes when they fail to function correctly.

The front-rear connection is notably significant because Tesla intrinsically recognized that an issue existed. Following multiple breakdowns of the Model S spanning 2016 through 2020, China’s State Administration for Market Regulation forced Tesla to substitute the connection with a higher ranking component.

In China, however, Tesla took a different approach. “We have identified a potential production issue with the power steering component in some Model S vehicles manufactured before April 2016,” the company said in a statement. “This recall only happened in China and nowhere else in the world.” The company said it would replace the power steering components on affected vehicles free of charge.Tesla’s decision to issue a recall in China but not in the United States has raised eyebrows. “There is no defect in the subject components and no associated safety risk,” a senior Tesla lawyer wrote to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). “The root cause of the issue is driver abuse.” Nevertheless, the company decided to take action in China.”We have identified a potential production issue with the power steering component in some Model S vehicles manufactured before April 2016,” Tesla said in a statement. “This recall only happened in China and nowhere else in the world.” The automaker added that it would replace the power steering components on affected vehicles free of charge.The stark contrast between Tesla’s approach in the U.S. and its approach in China has sparked questions about why the company chose to issue a recall in the latter country but not the former. “There

This year, Tesla users have lodged a total of 260 grievances to the NHTSA concerning issues with suspension and direction. Based on a Reuters review, from January 2021 to March 2022, the company substituted the upper control poles on 120,000 cars across the globe. These data were harvested from insideTesla records. At the same time, 66,000 half shafts have been replaced.

This report is sure to induce massive concerns in Tesla, for it has had its share of controversy before. Earlier this year, Reuters put out a piece that uncovered the car-manufacturer had an organized squad devoted to suppressing complaints from consumers involving range. Allegedly, the company even tinkered with an algorithm so that in-dash mileage would flaunt false readings.

Presently that the explosive has exploded, it should be intriguing to perceive how Tesla and Elon Musk answer.