Lawsuit Claims Major Customer Privacy Breach
Subsequent to a report about Tesla workers circulating images and video recordings from customer vehicles for amusement, a California Tesla holder documented a forthcoming class activity suit against the automaker in the US District Court for the Northern District of California. This action was brought following the Reuters coverage regarding bunches of Tesla staff trading intrusive clips and photographs obtained by patron vehicles’ cameras through internal messaging systems.
San Francisco resident and Tesla Model Y owner Henry Yeh recently filed a lawsuit against the electric car manufacturer, citing “tasteless and tortious entertainment” and “the humiliation of those surreptitiously recorded.” Yeh alleges that Tesla’s vehicles are equipped with cameras that record video footage of passengers without their knowledge or consent. He further claims that the company uses the footage for its own amusement, which he says constitutes “tasteless and tortious entertainment” and “the humiliation of those surreptitiously recorded.” Yeh is seeking damages for invasion of privacy and emotional distress.
“Parents have a vested interest in protecting their children’s privacy,” states a recent report. Indeed, parents’ interest in their children’s privacy is one of the most fundamental liberty interests society recognizes. This right is so deeply entrenched that it has been recognized in the United States Constitution and various international human rights treaties. As such, parents should be aware of their children’s online activities and take steps to protect their privacy.
![](https://motortrends.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/1_1125922.jpg)
“Upon learning of Tesla’s potential to utilize its cameras to breach his family’s privacy, Mr. Yeh was understandably incensed,” Jack Fitzgerald, an attorney representing Yeh, declared. “It is a violation of the California Constitution, which is incredibly strict in this regard. Tesla must be held responsible for these intrusions and for misinforming Yeh and other Tesla owners about their lax privacy protocols,” Fitzgerald concluded.
A lawsuit has been brought “against Tesla on behalf of himself, similarly-situated class members, and the general public.” The plaintiff is hoping to establish a class action, which would include anyone who has owned or leased a Tesla within the past four years. The suit alleges that Tesla has violated numerous consumer protection laws by misrepresenting the safety and performance of its vehicles.
![](https://motortrends.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/1_1125920.jpg)
The goal of the lawsuit is to “enjoin Tesla from engaging in its wrongful behavior, including violating the privacy of customers and others, and to recover actual and punitive damages.” The plaintiffs are seeking to prevent the company from continuing its wrongful practices and to be compensated for any harm suffered as a result. They are also requesting punitive damages, which are intended to punish the company for its wrongdoing.
In spite of pointing to the occurrence of behavior in the period between 2019 and 2022, as per the initial account, this does not signify that workers maintain ceasing transferring images and videos for their delight. It is also probable that such shenanigans may still be occurring beyond Tesla workplaces.
The study has reported that Tesla didn’t instantly react to a request for comment. While contacting them is an essential step, Tesla hadn’t had a press relations division for quite some time.
![](https://motortrends.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/1_1125921.jpg)
I found this article to be very eye-opening. Thanks for sharing.